May can only mean one
thing.Eurovison.(Well actually, Eurovision, the FA Cup, the Champions
League Final and the end of the domestic football season...but mainly
Eurovison).Eurovision is like Marmite;
you either love it or hate it (actually I don't mind Marmite, but I wouldn't
rave over it.I've pretty much just
undermined that analogy haven't I?).This year the show is being shown in USA for the first time.Goodness knows what they will make of it. And
last year Australia joined us...yeah I don’t understand that either.But Eurovision has never made sense, and
long may it never do so.
Today it may be the biggest,
campest annual celebration, but like so many things, its origins were not where
you would expect.It’s all down to the EBU
boffins.(Have you noticed that only
newspapers use the word “boffins” to describe people cleverer than
themselves?“Chiefs” is another one.Why is it always “Council Chiefs”? Surely in
this day and age that would be classed as being derogative to Native
Americans...or am I reading too much into this?Anyway, back to the EBU boffins).The EBU (European Broadcasting
Union) was created to bring a sort of unity across Europe after half a century
of...well ununity.One of the roles of
the EBU was to bring technical harmony across Europe (hence the reason European
tellies are PAL instead of the American NTSC,Except for France who used SECAM.Typical French).Anyway, one day
in the 1950’s the engineering department of the EBU were stroking their beards
and smoking their pipes and began considering whether an event could be staged
that would link together all the EBU countries (of which there were only 10 in
those days).Admittedly the European Cup
was televised across Europe, but that was just an outside broadcast from one
place. What these crazy sock and sandal wearers wanted was an event that
everybody could contribute to.Hence the
Eurovison Song Contest was formed ...as a technical exercise, nothing to do
with entertainment.
The formation of the
Eurovision Song Contest must go down as one of those happy accidents, like the
discovery of Post It notes and the slinky. To be honest, nothing has
changed.Faceook, Twitter and Google were
not created for fun; they were created because some nerds thought it would be a
good idea to see if they could.(Can I
just ask...is geek offensive and nerd not? Or is it vice versa?Or does one out nerd/geek the other?It’s very hard to know what to call people
these days without causing offense.I
remember the days when a geek/nerd was just known as a boffin.Happy days.)So the contest was formed and it actually became very popular.In Europe.In the UK we knew that this was just an engineering exercise and so
never made a real effort.Occasionally
we got lucky and won, but the problem with that was that we had to stage the
blooming thing.Between the 60’s and
80’s it was acceptable to host the event in a local conference centre
(Harrogate and Brighton being examples of two peaceful towns who had their
Saturday night ruined.It must have been
like all of the UK’s twin towns turning up at once in one location).But then in the 90’s it all got a bit
silly.More countries came into Europe
and the EBU and the event got bigger.Semifinals
were needed to thin out the numbers and t suddenly became, well, serious.The last time the UK won it was in 1997 and
so the next year we had to find somewhere to host the flaming thing, not to
mention 2 hosts.One host was obvious,
Sir Terry, but what about the other one?Well as luck would have it, Ulrika Jonsson had just finished filming
Gladiators at the NIA in Birmingham and said there was a good Travelodge close
by, so suddenly both problems resolved themselves.When you now look back at that show, it looks
a bit small compared to what we witnessed from Stockholm this weekend.
Some countries seemed to
actively not want to win it as they could not afford to stage it (yes, we are
talking about you Spain and Greece). Actually Spain and the UK do share a
common problem (and I’m not talking about expats and criminals on the run on
the Costa del Sol).We are both one of
the Big 5.Now this may sound impressive,
but it isn’t really.The Big 5 are the 5
countries who have contributed the most money to the EBU/Contest and so get
automatic entry; thus there is no chance that we would get knocked out in the
semis by Germany on penalties.The
remaining big 5 countries are Italy, France and Germany.Basically, the Big 5 were decided by the
modern languages curriculum of any 1970’s UK school.The problem we have by not being in the
semifinals is that no one knows our songs. By the time I watched last night’s
final I was used to the gothic hen party from Serbia, the curly haired Amy
Adams lookalike from Belgium and even the Australian lady who appeared to have come
dressed as toilet roll holder.But I had
no idea about the Bjork look-a-like from Germany or the dungaree clad lass from
Italy, not to mention the Frenchman who sang the chorus in English.
That could be one of the
reasons we do so badly, but mainly it’s because we enter bad songs and all the
expats who could vote for us, don’t, as they know that the whole thing is just
a big technical experiment. On the other hand all the Eastern Europeans who are
working their way around Europe do care, so they do vote for their own
countries.So really we only have
ourselves to blame.However, if you
consider that we do contribute so much money, it’s like spending a lot of money
on an expensive racehorse, but not actually betting on it to win any
races.There again, perhaps the British public
is savvy to the fact that 60 years on, Eurovison is still primarily a technical
experiment; secondly it’s an excuse to show off your country’s biggest arenas
and light shows and somewhere down the list, it’s a song contest.Also we’ve had our time in the limelight, so
perhaps it’s time to let the new gang have their day.They’ll soon know how we feel...when they let
China in to play.